Darwin's resurrection

I've spent the last couple of weeks trying to decide in which direction to take my blog. I'm still not sure what I have to say to those of you who are currently following and especially those who are just beginning to log on. I suppose since I am still unsure, no format is yet needed, therefore I will spill my thoughts as they manifest.


I declared backing the "occupy" movement in my last entry. I also mentioned that I was unsure of their direction, but I would rather take my chances with new leadership than try and coexist with the current tyranny. I would just like to add that I think the idea of a "leaderless" organization may be a brilliant idea indeed.


Thousands of years ago when my people were hidden into the Earth, there were already civilizations, kings, gods etc. and thus I believe "man" had already started his decline. Look at it this way: Darwin believed that all living things evolved from a single life form. If this is true then it stands to reason that life has existed on this planet through many difficulties by exploring new resources and sharing their strengths with one another. The fast agile female lion will do most of the chasing down of wild gazelles while the more massive and stronger male will protect the den from predators. Animals of a same species will use their strengths in harmony to assure it's existence throughout time.


Before man had mastered becoming the top of the food chain and wandered the lands as groups of nomads, he had already taken his first step toward his own demise. Man has always had wonder and unanswered questions, so it was inevitable that sooner or later someone would claim to have answers. The world had its first witch-doctors and priests and shamans. Men who claimed to have a higher knowledge or understanding of the world, usually through a fabricated god or spirit of some kind. The motive for someone to claim to have these abilities was simple: if what you have is in high demand, you have the ability to trade it to the followers and believers for various necessities or wants.


As time went on and man learned to raise game and livestock as well as cultivate plants, civilization became a reality and now not only was there an ever-growing need for answers, but also those who claimed to answer to a higher power could market their talent to an even bigger audience as people became more established. Many civilizations have flourished and profited from this common way of things, but every dynasty of man has also fallen sooner or later and possibly from the same structure flaw.


I believe the problem is this: Since the beginning of civilization, man has always used a "pyramid" type structure of power or rule. For example a god or gods at the top of the pyramid with a king or shaman just below the leaders appoint special positions to friends or family, slaves at the very bottom and everyone else in between. My point being that while man is the only "civilized" species on the planet he is also the only species to use the "pyramid" order of rule and I believe that when you take a broad group of a species and force them to collect all their resources and use all their strengths for the good of only a small number of leaders at the top, you sacrifice much of the knowledge, creativity and genetic excellence of the majority and thus you hinder the production and progress of your species.


My people are just as much to blame as yours. To say its possible to reverse civilization is ludicrous, but I have faith that through intelligence and wisdom, the majority is beginning to understand this flaw, and hopefully through the same intelligence and wisdom, answers will emerge.

occupying a place other than the apt.

To those of you who have been following along: I'm sorry I've been away for so long. I took a flight to Atlanta over the holidays to follow a particular lead. It was either a false alarm or a hoax. From any perspective I seem to be no closer to finding any of my family.

That's not the only reason for delaying my blog. While returning from Atlanta one of the investigators working for Derek and I informed us that my location may be compromised. The origin of the information leak was unknown, so Derek and I were escorted to a safe house by the head investigator as it was believed that occupying the apartment might be dangerous. This too turned out to be a false alarm, but until we were sure, I didn't want to blog on this site until I knew it was safe.

This brings me to yet another topic. I mentioned before that I had dropped off some necessities to the local "occupy" group. I also said that I wasn't sure where I stood as far as backing them or not. I have thought long and hard about this and I have made a decision. I'm not sure that I could pinpoint the exact goals of the occupy movement and for that reason it is hard to get behind them, but I have come to this realization...There seem to be hundreds of people in that group with hundreds of different ideas, but they can all agree that the current "powers that be" are not governing efficiently and I think that is a point that 99 percent CAN agree on. I have been hunted and assaulted since the governments first knowledge of my existence. I've not harmed them in any way, but they made it quite clear at the airport that they were not interested in sitting down and talking or anything remotely civilized. The United States government has made it abundantly clear to me that they have no intentions of negotiating, collaborating, or responding in anyway except brute force to those that they do not understand or those who offer a different perspective or those who question their motives.

I'm not sure that I believe in everything that "occupiers" may stand for, but I know that I can agree with them that the government has seriously misused it's governing authority as well as mislead it's citizens. I think many politicians have "crawled into bed" with huge corporate companies and corrupted true capitalism and free enterprise in exchange for money. I think that many of these politicians knew that it would lead to the economic demise of many, many hard working citizens but they didn't care. Please write in and correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that if a public service employee (politician) purposefully jeopardized the well being of those who elected him ( U.S. citizens ) that public servant not only broke an oath when he was sworn into office, but he was also guilty committing a particular crime (treason).

To commit treason is considered such an intolerable crime with such grim consequences that it CAN be punishable with a death sentence. If they were jaywalking or committing petty theft they would still be wrong for doing so, but these guys are engaging in acts that destroy many peoples lives and well being.

It's for this reason that I've decided to back the "occupy" movement in any way that I can. So if any of my followers are participants of the movement, I wish you prosperity in your goals and I will continue to show my support in every way that I am able.